Aviation needs emergency funding
February 11, 2016
Central’s aviation department is in a state of emergency and is requesting $3.5 million in state funding to expand its facilities.
Central currently has 150 students studying aviation with only one classroom in the aviation facility. Other classes are held in Black Hall where the department chair, Sundaram Nataraja, is stationed.
According to Nataraja, the aviation facilities are inadequate for current students and faculty. This is a problem considering that the aviation program is growing.
Last year, the program doubled in size and Nataraja said he expects about 100 incoming students next fall quarter. Eventually, he said he would like the program to involve over 1,000 students.
“In order to meet the demand of the industry for qualified professionals,” Nataraja said. “We, as a state school, have a kind of responsibility to provide man power.”
To help alleviate this problem, Nataraja and Central President James Gaudino went to Olympia on Jan. 28 to request $3.5 million in emergency state funding.
Washington Legislature’s aviation caucus is still deciding on the grant, but Nataraja is hopeful.
“I personally expect, yes, it’ll happen,” Nataraja said. “We didn’t go there begging for money, but we sent a message.”
Nataraja expects to receive the caucus’ decision within the next two months and the facilities to be built within an additional two to three months, just in time for Fall quarter.
The Washington Legislature plans school funding every other year and the next period will be the summer of 2017. This is why the aviation department needs emergency funding, according to Nataraja.
Additionally, during the next funding period, Nataraja plans to request funding to build a hangar for the aircraft. Currently, the planes are exposed to the elements during winter.
The current facility consist of one classroom, two faculty offices, 10 flight briefing rooms, a small testing rooms and two flight simulator rooms.
All of the emergency funding will go towards finishing the current aviation facility, which is only in phase one of production. Phase two will add four classrooms and four faculty offices.
These additions were a part of the original plan formed in 2007 but, according to Nataraja, because of the 2008 financial crisis, only the first phase was constructed.
The funding will only go towards the raw materials and building of phase two. The design is drawn out in the 2007 plan and any leftover funding will go towards more classrooms.
Additionally, the new facilities will prevent a current problem of student parking.
Since aviation students rush between the aviation facility and Black Hall for classes, they often have trouble with parking and getting to class on time.
The completion of the new facility will provide a space for all students and faculty to meet under one roof and help streamline the curriculum.
In addition to growing the program to 1,000 students, Nataraja wants to diversify the undergraduate curriculum and even provide a Master’s Degree in aviation.
The current undergrad program consists of a Bachelor of Science in Professional Piloting and Aviation Management. Nataraja hopes to add mechanic and maintenance specializations.
The master’s program is already planned out and just needs approval by the faculty senate. Nataraja is looking to have it ready by next fall quarter.
According to Nataraja, the aviation department also plans to reach out to its over 1,400 alumni, some of which are captains for Delta and United Airlines
“We want to connect with them and bring them home so they can be an inspiration for our young students,” Nataraja said.
Because of FAA regulations requiring pilots to retire at 65, Nataraja expects the U.S. will need about 110,000 pilots and 60,000 aviation managers next year.
He is excited to give students the opportunity to fill these positions.
“The department is looking forward to providing quality oriented education, a memorable learning experience and a compassionate environment for students,” Nataraja said.
Lyle Pfeifer • Feb 23, 2016 at 7:21 pm
According to state Senator Judy Warrnick’s office, this request for emergency funding never happened. As in there was NEVER a request for funding. Just curious if you got you info first hand from the Chair of the department or second or third hand.
Lyle Pfeifer
Lyle Pfeifer • Feb 27, 2016 at 8:51 pm
Still waiting for the Observer staff to respond……
Kailan Manandic • Mar 1, 2016 at 11:57 am
Hi, I’m the reporter for this story and I spoke with the Chair directly. I got all of this information first hand from him.
Lyle Pfeifer • Mar 28, 2016 at 8:24 pm
Suggest you call state senator Judy Warrnick’s office.
Victoria • Feb 12, 2016 at 9:45 pm
Why does your article say the program has 150 students and this one http://www.redding.com/business/local/iascos-new-owners-committed-to-stay-in-redding-ep-1398329183-360995831.html?d=mobile says 120? Did central gain 30 studs in 2 months? Your article seems pretty one sided. I guess the observer doesn’t do investigate give journalism as much as plugs for citizens to pay to fix poor choices by CWU admin. At least now we have that covered.
Lyle Pfeifer • Feb 12, 2016 at 4:12 pm
If CWU hadn’t sold its sole to the Devil, the current provider, and re-bid the contract this would not be a problem. The previous provider supplied the flight training building, the dispatchers, their ramp snow removal, the office space for the instructors, the line guys to move the airplanes, and support equipment all under a cheaper contract and cheaper aircraft rates than currently being charged. Oh, let’s not forget, NEWER AIRCRAFT!
CWU, decided they could do it their way and with the help of the state assistant attorney general, came up with a plan to circumnavigate the bidding process with a client services contract. Why? Because when the school year of 2014 rolled around the current contractor had ONE airplane sitting at the airport at the start of that year. The previous contractor had 18! The contractor, IASCO was going to bail as they quickly realized they could not operate at the price they bid and the parent company was in financial trouble. What do you do when your out of options as CWU was? Make a bad situation worse and deal with a contractor who lied about equipment they would provide and the price they bid was well under the other 2 reputable bidders who were not chosen. Everyone familiar with operating costs knew they could not operate the contract for the bid price. Well everyone but, CWU.
IASCO did not secure an operating facility at the airport, in fact they started operating in violation of county ordnances without even talking with the county to advise them they would be operating at the airport. With no facility available, CWU tore apart their flight simulator building to provide office space for the operator when it had been previously supplied by private business. It cost CWU well north of $45,000 to remodel what should have never had to be. Not only that, they provided 3 dispatchers, computer systems and office chairs and desks. ALL of this support equipment and the building to house it was provided by the previous contractor and was to be provided by this contractor according to the original bid. CWU HAD all the building space they needed at the airport, BEFORE that deal with the Devil. Oh, and the best part of all this, IASCO gets it all for FREE!
Every student going to CWU is paying what a private businesses provided by contract to this new contractor. If your a Business Major, your learning how not to do business, but rest assured part of your tuition is being used to provide office space and support staff for the aviation degree your not attaining. Music majors, this is you to. Sour notes you say? Talk to the president, this is his baby!
As a Kittitas county resident and a Washington state tax payer, I am appalled this was allowed to happen! My tax money goes for all the essential services we all enjoy. Paved roads, snow removal, hospital, fire department, police department, ambulance service, and schools. And this provider settled with the county to operated at the airport for $500 a year. They are taking over $1.5 Million out of the county and paying nothing for it! I pay over $6000 a year in property tax to the county along with all the other residents for the same essential services IASCO gets for $500. Not a big thing I know if your a student going to CWU, but it’s huge when I watch my taxes go up to support a free loader!